The RPL process focused on relevant skills | |
Overall, I am satisfied with the RPL process | |
The staff respected my background and needs | |
Assessors had an excellent knowledge of the subject content | |
I received useful feedback on my RPL submission | |
The way my RPL was assessed was a fair test of my skills and knowledge | |
The amount of work I had to do was reasonable | |
The RPL Assessment was based on realistic activities | |
The facilities and materials were in good condition | |
I had a clear idea of what was expected of me | |
The RPL assessor supported me throughout the RPL process | |
Master Builders Association of Victoria had a range of services to support me | |
The RPL assessment was interesting and engaging | |
The RPL process was flexible enough to meet my needs | |
Assessors encouraged me to ask questions | |
The RPL process and all the related information were clearly explained to me at the time of enrolment | |
What were the best aspects of the RPL process ? | |
What aspects of the RPL process were most in need of improvement? | |
How likely is it that you would recommend this RPL process to a friend or colleague? 0 being ‘not likely at all’, 5 being ‘neutral’ and 10 being ‘extremely likely’. | |
If you would like to provide a testimonial regarding this program, please complete this field (including your name and company name). Any comments provided may be used by Master Builders Association of Victoria for advertising purposes. | |